Royal Courts of Justice illegal proceedings

(Orders in Italic, followed by responses)
The court is hereby notified that websites continue to appear attacking the father and full of defamation as well as other orders in breach:

ORDER OF MARCH 2, 2010
The draft letter of instruction to be circulated by 4pm (UK time) 16^th March 2010; to be agreed by 4pm (UK time) 23^rd March 2010 and in default of agreement to be dispatched by March 2010 4pm (UK time) 26^th March 2010. Cafcass shall file and serve the report by 4pm (UK time) 30^th July 2010.

NOT RECEIVED

Cafcass shall file and serve a report to include the results of the Solicitor for the child’s enquiries in Texas and Mexico and to include the Guardian ad Litem’s recommendations in respect of the Mother’s and Father’s applications by 4pm (UK time) on 24^th September 2010.

NOT RECEIVED

Solicitors for the Mother do provide the Father with an up to date index 14 days before the Case Management hearing and the Father upon receipt is to forthwith indicate which documents he does not have in his possession. In that event the Mother’s Solicitors are to serve copies of the said documents by email upon {address provided}
RECORDS REQUESTED NOT RECEIVED

ORDERS OF JULY 1, 2010:
By releasing confidential information from these proceedings into the public domain the Father is in breach of orders of this Court and is in contempt of this Court.
NO EVIDENCE PROVIDED AND REQUESTED, NOT RECEIVED. Unknown what is claimed to be considered confidential information

The Father be permitted to see only that part of the letter of instruction which contains the questions to be put to the Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist.

THE DOCUMENT IS TITLED “Extract from letter of instructions to psychiatrist”
AND REFERS TO EVIDENCE NOT RECEIVED, IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED SUCH EVIDENCE AS WELL AS WHOM MADE SUCH QUESTIONS (Ex; guardian Ad Litem, Cafcass, Brethertons etc...) THE FATHER HAS THE RIGHT TO BE PROVIDED WITH SUCH RECORDS.

By emailing the Mother directly, the Father is in beach of orders of this Court and is in contempt of this Court.

THE FATHER REQUESTED AN EMAIL FOR SERVICE, NONE RECEIVED. THE FATHER IS OBLIGE TO USE SAMLOWRY007@HOTMAIL.COM <mailto:SAMLOWRY007@HOTMAIL.COM> FOR SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS UNTIL THE COURT PROVIDES AN EMAIL FOR SERVICE.

The parties do exchange any skeleton arguments by no later than 4pm (UK time) on 29^th July 2010.
NOT RECEIVED

The Mother do file and serve her statement in reply (if so advized) by 4 pm (UK time) 13^th August 2010.
NOT RECEIVED

In the event that the Father applies for a transcript of the hearing of the 1^st July 2010 there be permission to the Mother’s Solicitors and to the Solicitor for the child to redact any sensitive information or information as might lead to the identification of any individual but subject to the approval of Hogg J. On approval of any transcript by Hogg J the transcript be released to the Father. The costs of obtaining a transcript be at public expense.

THE FATHER DID APPLY FOR THE TRANSCRIPT OF JULY 1, 2010 AND OF AUGUST 2 2010. (see records filed for August 2, 2010 hearing) NONE HAS BEEN RECEIVED. THE FATHER ALSO REQUESTED HIS PLEADINGS SEALED (as to know what records have been filed and served in court since none of his pleadings have been answered and such records are required AND NEEDED)

ORDERS OF AUGUST 2, 2010
The Father’s participation in the hearings of the mother’s applications on the October 2010 (the case management Hearing) and on 22 November 2010 (the Final Hearing) Shall (subject to further direction by the trial Judge) take place by video link to Mexico and if the father wishes to participate in either hearing the Father is to attend such venue as is identified by the children’s Guardian . The children’s Guardian do notify the Father by email of said venue by no later than 4pm UK time the 23 September 2010 .
Such proceedings would be illegal in Mexico and in direct violations to the father rights. ( Proceedings of England an their laws in a Mexican court?)
Forum Non conveniens, Fair trial impossible: The father objects to venue and England is an impossible forum as further described on the records filed by the father in court for July 1 and August 2, 2010.
Pacta sum servanda: Samantha Lowry continues to withhold by theft all documents, records and property of the father and in breach of the International settlement agrement under hague proceedings (41 pages) the father continues with the objection on these proceedings (further described on the records filed by the father on August 2, 2010 , including but not limited to the judicial protocol.) THE LOCATION OF THIS VENUE HAS NOT EVEN BEEN IDENTIFIED (please see below)
The father hereby objects to “venue” and/on the matter of jurisdiction

4. The Father is to confirm in writing by 4pm (UK time) on the 7 October 2010 whether he intends to participate by video link from the identified venue.
Such proceedings would be illegal in Mexico. The father hereby request the sealed unedited records of the Mexican Court that is explicit on this matter, and where the court is also aware of the Agreement under the hague convention and public deed and several existing proceedings . Also any letter of rogatory.

5. Paragraph 6 of the order of the 1 July 2010 be varied so that the Court further directs that in the events that the Father does not comply with paragraph 2 of that order, the Father shall not be entitled additionally to receive the reprot of the Children’s Guardian; the issue of whether the Father should have part or all of such reprot is to be considered further at the Case Management Hearing

THE FATHER HAS STATED HE HAS COMPLIED WITH THE ORDER OF JUSTICE HEDLEY AND HE GIVES HIS ASSURANCE THAT NO INFORMATION IN THE INTERNET FROM ANY OF THE AUTHORIZED SITES OR HIS SITES HAVE BREACH SUCH ORDER. FURTHERMORE, HE REQUESTED TO SUPPLY SUCH INFORMATION THAT IS CLAIM TO BE IN BREACH AND HE WILL IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ANY SUCH INFORMATION IF IT IS WITHIN THE AUTHORIZED SITES OR ANY OF HIS SITES. NONE HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

7. In the events the Father applies for a transcript of the hearing of the 1 July 2010 and of the hearing of the 2 August 2010, the transcripts must be first served on the solicitor for the child. Then be permission to the solicitor for the child to redact any sensitive information or information as might lead to the identification of any individual but subject to the approval of Mrs Justice HOGG and of Mrs Justice Eleanor KING. On approval of any transcript by Mrs Justice HOGG and by Mrs Justice Eleanor KING, the transcript be release to the father. The Cost of obtaining a transcript be solely at the Father’s expense.
THE FATHER REQUESTED THE TRANSCRIPTS AND OTHER RECORDS PREVIOUS TO THIS AT THE TIME THE COST WAS TO BE AT PUBLIC EXPENSE. THE MOTHER HAS ALL THE PROPERTY STOLEN OF THE FATHER AND ALL , MONEY, DOCUMENTS, IDENTIFICATIONS AND PROPERTY. THIS ARBITRARY ORDER WILL MAKE IMPOSSIBLE EVEN SENDING A PAYMENT. FURTHERMORE, BY NOT RECEIVING SUCH TRANSCRIPTS HAS DELAYED AND WILL DELAY ALL PROCEEDINGS, SINCE THE FATHER CANNOT CONTINUE PROCEEDINGS THAT HE IS UNAWARE OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND AS REFLECTED ON THE JUDICIAL PROTOCOL (WITHOUT RESPONSE) SUCH HEARINGS WERE MALICIOUSLY MADE TO KEEP THE FATHER OUT OF PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FAILURE TO PROVIDE A PHONE NUMBER WHERE THE FATHER COULD HAVE CALLED THE COURT
IF THIS REQUEST IS DENIED, THE FATHER HEREBY REQUEST THE EXACT REASON WHY.

REQUEST
Under the applicable laws, treaties and jurisdictions involved, the father hereby request the following:

1)Letter of rogatory in regards to this case with the Mexican Authorities, including but not limited as to obtain a family court to “facilitate” a location for video link

To please provide the documents (Sealed) required to be given by any Mexican court in regards to the hearings to take place via video link. Such records must be provided before the father could appear via video link

2)To receive all records requested and not received up to date, including but not limited to the transcripts, certified copies of the pleadings filed by the father, the skeleton argument of the mother, affidavit of the mother form C1A of the mother, and other records that up to date have not yet been received (Please also refer to the email sent to the Brethertons on July 7, 2010) and email to Cafcass and guardian ad Litem of the same date. The father also requested a fact finding hearing that will reduce the documents to be used and the removal of records that are been handled in other proceedings abroad or Claims of Samantha already proven false.

3)Before any interviews or talks or any other proceedings take place, the father must have received and have time to review all missing records, including but not limited to #2, transcripts, sealed pleadings of the father received by the court and evidence records used to make findings of contempt, as so far, none have been provided and none of the pleadings of the father have received any response, or comments, therefore unaware if they have been received by the court.

4)The judicial protocol was neither answered and hereby is requested an answer
The father continues to object to these proceedings and jurisdiction, including but not limited to the findings of contempt, as well as these proceedings as further described on the judicial protocol and previously filed records.

5)The father objects to the representation of Cafcass and the child having a child lawyer, as well as a guardian ad Litem under the ground that 1) he is not of an age of understanding and cannot, at his age express his wishes or needs and/or 2) by law, Cafcass, Guardian ad Litem and any lawyer shall be neutral, and records of evidence provide clear evidence they have been bias to the mother and with concealment of records and omissions which breaches their duties and purpose of their position 3) Such acts harming permanently the father and child rights and others. Directly violating the child rights and aiding and abetting kidnapping, theft and breach of the Hague Convention treaty and its purpose. (Further reading Judicial Protocol)

6)It is hereby further remember to the court of existing proceedings in the rightful jurisdictions where the mother has failed to reply, furthermore, of the violations to human rights of the child and the father that continue to be violated.

7)The concealment of records that continue up to date, and the continuance of the use of already proven forgeries, perjuries, false claims such as the email of November 3, 2010 and the withholding by the mother of stolen property and records of the Pavon Cuellar family must be resolved before any hearing or reports take place. Permitting this behaviour in the High Court of Justice is to promote criminal acts.

8)The father hereby request the exact reason and grounds, including but not limited to evidence records, why names, records, whereabouts of the child, medical records and other matters remain concealed. The child is kidnapped, in breach of an agreement under Hague Proceedings. The father has been deprived arbitrarily from his rights and property and even without the opportunity to be heard, the child also is been deprived of his rights and patrimony by fraud and deception and through malicious and illegal representation.

9)The father continue to request the records of evidence used to have the official solicitor act, AS ADVOCATE , WITHOUT NOTICE, NOT EVEN TO FAMILY OF THE FATHER.

The father seeks relief from justice on fairness and equality, and the respect of the rights of the child and his family.
All pleadings of the father have been and continue to be ignored. And can be said that from all the request of the father and pleadings, none have been granted, not even the request for production, not even depositions, only a one page medical report of the child with incomplete dates that just have caused mental anguish to the father by seen the poor health of the child and the neglect he is under.
September 29, 2010
All rights reserved